New
Oct 10, 2015 9:03 PM
#1
Episode Feature Updates Our anime episode feature has been expanded! Characters, seiyuu (voice actors) and staff members are now able to be linked to individual episodes. You can help us catalogue this information in two ways:
Anime DB Moderator Recruitment With our database continually expanding, we are currently looking for helpful individuals who have a passion for anime and would like to contribute to MAL's anime database. All anime moderator positions are voluntary. An anime moderator's duties include, but are not limited to:
Part 1: New Anime Addition Submit an anime entry that we do not currently have in our database via the add anime link. This may be an old title or a new title. Make sure to add "Anime mod app" in the More Info section. Part 2: Fake MAL News Draw up a fake anime add page and screenshot it (without submitting it to the database!) for the following fake news posts. Please include a link to the picture you would add to the entry and which producers, people and/or characters you would link to the entry. (Post said: According to the cover note of Bessatsu Margaret's October issue, a new Ore Monogatari!! anime will be bundled with the 10th volume of the manga. It will be an autumn special, independent from the manga storyline. Source: Comic Natalie (Post said: According to its official website, Concrete Revolutio: Choujin Gensou will receive an original series of super-deformed shorts, with one 3 minute episode appearing on each BD/DVD volume. Source: Concrete Revolutio official website (Post said: To celebrate the 10 year anniversary of manga Shirokuma Café, a one-hour TV special will be broadcast on February 28, 2016. The first half will be dedicated to invited seiyuu, including Takahiro Sakurai, Yuuichi Nakamura, and Hiroshi Kamiya, recapping their favourite scenes from the TV anime adaptation. A question and answer period will then take approximately twenty minutes, with the final ten minutes highlighting popular character songs. Source: Cocohana Part 3: Short Answer Please answer the following questions. A. An anime short movie is announced to be bundled with the limited edition of Bad Apple Wars. A few weeks later, a TV series is then announced, with the first two episodes to be aired on TV and the other 10 episodes aired online. Identify the titles and types of the entries that would be added to the database. B. An animation production titled The 2 QueenS was announced in March 2013. Discuss its eligibility for inclusion in the database, assuming that the work is still in production and has an announced release date. C. Explain why Digimon Adventure 02 Movie is listed with two episodes instead of one. Identify the event in which it premiered and the other movie that premiered with it. D. It is announced that Strike the Blood will receive a prologue OVA episode, to be bundled with the 8th volume of the manga. Similarly, Akagami no Shirayuki-hime will receive a second OVA episode, to be bundled with LaLa DX's April 2016 issue. Discuss how you would handle these new OVA anime announcements (i.e. adding a new OVA entry and/or updating an old entry). E. An original anime is announced to air as a one cours TV series during the Summer 2016 season. In November 2015, a manga adaptation begins serialization in Shounen Sunday. Discuss if the anime would be given the shounen demographic. F. Takena Nagao is an independent stop-motion animator. Identify which of his works allowed him entry to the database and under which guideline rule. Part 4: Spot the Errors Find as many errors as possible on the following fake anime additions. Part 5: Send in Your Application Send me a PM including the following:
This procedure doubles as an application and a teaching tool. It is meant to give potential moderators some experience with things they will need to face in the future. There is often no better way to learn than having hands-on training. Thus, please feel free to PM me with any questions regarding the application, anime moderator duties or Anime DB Guidelines. You will not be docked points for asking questions; however, the quality of your questions will be considered along with your application. We want anime moderators who are confident in what they do, but who are also not afraid to ask when they aren't sure of the answers. Submissions will be open for two weeks, ending on Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 23:59 Pacific Time. We look forward to reading your applications! Thank you for your interest :) Open Applications for Moderators Interested in a different moderator position? Check out the new How to Become a MAL Moderator thread. |
Oct 10, 2015 9:23 PM
#2
Awesome new improvement for the site! (Yay for seiyuus being included to each episode!) I'll just help out behind the scenes ~ Good luck to all aspiring moderators! *There should have a higher focus on People position submissions *And MAL should add a position for "End Card Illustrator", there's a lot there This site is to help out with finding staff positions: http://seesaawiki.jp/w/radioi_34/ |
removed-userOct 10, 2015 10:48 PM
Oct 10, 2015 10:33 PM
#3
hmmm, do i want the responsibility or not. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Oct 10, 2015 11:24 PM
#4
For characters that appear in the episode but don't say anything do we just submit them as normal? Or do we deselect their seiyuu? |
There is no such thing as shit taste. Only idiots who think everyone should have the same taste as they do. |
Oct 10, 2015 11:44 PM
#5
Applied. MAL needs more pedantic people working on the database that can make things as consistent as possible. |
Oct 11, 2015 12:05 AM
#6
Good luck to anyone applying. With MAL aiming to become a powerhouse in excess now, such an announcement was to be expected. That said, it is nice to see it. It means at least one source will expand even further and cover potential details, which is good. That said, I'll enjoy it as a customer/participant and that alone. I also recommend everyone thinking of applying to read the OP again and comprehend the weight behind the statements shared there. |
Oct 11, 2015 2:12 AM
#7
kuuderes_shadow said: For characters that appear in the episode but don't say anything do we just submit them as normal? Or do we deselect their seiyuu? See Section I of the Character & People DB Guidelines: "Characters will not be related to series they made brief cameos in or were referenced to in." The same applies to episodes. An exception would be Suguru Koshigaya in Non Non Biyori, where he is a non-speaking character from the start. |
arsonalOct 11, 2015 2:21 AM
Oct 11, 2015 3:01 AM
#8
I hope that the new recruitment of anime DB moderators will bring us people who will read our users’ submissions before accepting them; the number of typos and grammatical errors in the anime DB raises some serious doubts. [empty dreams]I hope to see more individuals that will be close to arsonal’s and Naruleach’s understanding of grammar and punctuation.[/empty dreams] |
Oct 11, 2015 3:03 AM
#9
Grudge said: I hope that the new recruitment of anime DB moderators will bring us people who will read our users’ submissions before accepting them; the number of typos and grammatical errors in the anime DB raises some serious doubts. [empty dreams]I hope to see more individuals that will be close to arsonal’s and Naruleach’s understanding of grammar and punctuation.[/empty dreams] I feel this. |
Oct 11, 2015 3:06 AM
#10
arsonal said: kuuderes_shadow said: For characters that appear in the episode but don't say anything do we just submit them as normal? Or do we deselect their seiyuu? See Section I of the Character & People DB Guidelines: "Characters will not be related to series they made brief cameos in or were referenced to in." The same applies to episodes. An exception would be Suguru Koshigaya in Non Non Biyori, where he is a non-speaking character from the start. I'm talking about situations where characters, who are listed for the series and have lines in other episodes, appear fairly prominently in the episode but don't actually say anything - so their seiyuu wasn't actually involved in the episode. I was actually going through Yuru Yuri episode 1 at the time I asked - which has Yoshikawa Tomoko prominently on screen for about 20 seconds, and Mirakurun appearing multiple times, but neither actually has any lines. Are you saying that these should not be included in the lists for these episodes at all? (on the other hand Ikeda Chitose has far less time on screen and only says one word but this would warrant inclusion?) And there are situations that go further - times where named characters with voice actors are featured prominently in an episode but don't actually say anything for the entire time. Is it right that the seiyuu gets listed for that episode when they weren't actually involved in it? Or for their character to be removed entirely from that episode just because they don't have any lines? These situations aren't exactly cameos or references. And it's different with episodes than for full anime - in the latter case, as with Suguru, they wouldn't be credited with a voice actor in the first place. |
There is no such thing as shit taste. Only idiots who think everyone should have the same taste as they do. |
Oct 11, 2015 3:12 AM
#11
Grudge said: [empty dreams]I hope to see more individuals that will be close to arsonal’s and Naruleach’s understanding of grammar and punctuation.[/empty dreams] ye keep dreaming, since i doubt there are that many applicants since as you said some people are accepted to the job with poor grammar personally, having bad grammar myself, i do not mind grammar much as long as its understandable, the infos provided are much more important to me than some trivial perfection of language, and also you are seriously decreasing the number of people that will be qualified for the job if you keep insisting perfect grammar should be mandatory, staff jobs are also voluntary, stressful and time consuming so that will decrease again the amount of people that will apply |
Oct 11, 2015 3:36 AM
#12
ios said: ye keep dreaming, since i doubt there are that many applicants since as you said some people are accepted to the job with poor grammar personally, having bad grammar myself, i do not mind grammar much as long as its understandable, the infos provided are much more important to me than some trivial perfection of language, and also you are seriously decreasing the number of people that will be qualified for the job if you keep insisting perfect grammar should be mandatory, staff jobs are also voluntary, stressful and time consuming so that will decrease again the amount of people that will apply Sora from NGNL >..His lust lead to a linguistic mistake that causes Stephanie to fall in love with him and causes him to receive a scolding from Shiro… I don’t think that finding a mistake in this sentence will require a C1 or a C2 in English; it will require only two things: attentiveness and conscientiousness. |
Oct 11, 2015 7:56 AM
#13
kuuderes_shadow said: I was actually going through Yuru Yuri episode 1 at the time I asked - which has Yoshikawa Tomoko prominently on screen for about 20 seconds, and Mirakurun appearing multiple times, but neither actually has any lines. Are you saying that these should not be included in the lists for these episodes at all? (on the other hand Ikeda Chitose has far less time on screen and only says one word but this would warrant inclusion?) Correct. We treat these as cameos. kuuderes_shadow said: And there are situations that go further - times where named characters with voice actors are featured prominently in an episode but don't actually say anything for the entire time. Is it right that the seiyuu gets listed for that episode when they weren't actually involved in it? Or for their character to be removed entirely from that episode just because they don't have any lines? As a rule of thumb, the character and seiyuu role should be credited in the ending credits of the episode. If the character is not listed in the credits, it should not be associated with the episode. Again, some exceptions do apply. For example, in the Saki series, some minor characters have the same seiyuu voicing them. One of the roles may be uncredited in the ending credits, but if that voice role is well-referenced and that character has a voiced line in the episode, the listing will be allowed. |
Oct 11, 2015 11:17 AM
#14
Wish i could apply, but i'm only 15 |
Oct 11, 2015 1:13 PM
#15
Oct 11, 2015 2:26 PM
#16
Interesting update. I don't think I want to be a mod, though... I'll consider. |
It's time you look inward and begin asking yourself the big question, "Who are you, and what do you want?" - Uncle Iroh |
Oct 11, 2015 4:09 PM
#17
Good luck to anyone who applies! |
Oct 11, 2015 5:00 PM
#18
Huh Thanks for reminding me of the Episode Details page( are there still going to be more updates for it? (I wonder)), anyone who is a enthusiast would like this. Since anyone who re-watches anime can now specifically add what characters show up within each episode. As for the Mod thing, yeah have fun guys :v |
Oct 13, 2015 5:16 AM
#19
All the best for people who are joining. Hope atleast 1 Fujoshi/Fudanshi so that I can chat with him/her easily XD |
Oct 13, 2015 9:12 AM
#20
Don't know if I should apply-_- |
Oct 13, 2015 9:15 AM
#21
Georgiet said: Don't know if I should apply-_- |
Oct 13, 2015 9:23 AM
#22
Love the new addition. Great job team, always looking forward to more updates and features! |
Tumblr | Anime List | 🌷🌼 |
Oct 13, 2015 6:53 PM
#23
Good luck, everyone. :) |
Oct 14, 2015 7:45 AM
#24
volao said: To apply, or not to apply, that is the question.aplied |
Oct 14, 2015 8:58 AM
#25
Grudge said: volao said: To apply, or not to apply, that is the question.aplied A trivial question, indeed. |
Oct 16, 2015 9:55 AM
#26
Oct 17, 2015 1:47 PM
#27
Thought about applying, but too busy doing other things IRL atm :P maybe next year... |
Oct 19, 2015 2:12 AM
#28
Oct 19, 2015 7:04 AM
#29
BatoKusanagi said: *Thinks about applying, then looks at OP* Nah. Good luck to the applicants. Indeed. I think people will have an easier time applying for a CIA position than this. For something like voluntary work, there sure are a lot of hoops you need to jump through here. |
Oct 19, 2015 9:58 AM
#30
Because it's voluntary work, that suddenly means people don't need passion, a desire to learn, nor be willing to face challenges? Being an Anime Mod isn't about clicking "Accept" on user submissions. It's about understanding the database and anime - or having a desire to learn to understand. It's about being able to motivate yourself to deal with entries you don't know about. It's about having a passion for searching information and improving the database. One motivational paragraph isn't going to tell me you have any of these qualities. The "test" includes situations Anime Moderators need to deal with every day. If you don't know how to handle them now, any new moderators will need to learn quickly. The application helps facilitate this learning process, while also demonstrating passion and motivation. |
Oct 19, 2015 10:55 AM
#31
Kineta said: Because it's voluntary work, that suddenly means people don't need passion, a desire to learn, nor be willing to face challenges? Being an Anime Mod isn't about clicking "Accept" on user submissions. It's about understanding the database and anime - or having a desire to learn to understand. It's about being able to motivate yourself to deal with entries you don't know about. It's about having a passion for searching information and improving the database. One motivational paragraph isn't going to tell me you have any of these qualities. The "test" includes situations Anime Moderators need to deal with every day. If you don't know how to handle them now, any new moderators will need to learn quickly. The application helps facilitate this learning process, while also demonstrating passion and motivation. But at the same token, the application process is also extremely misleading when it comes to it reflecting the role of an Anime Moderator. As far as I'm concerned, I find this application immensely fun. It poses a challenge and requires a person to dig deeper with interest and a knack, or should I say, the right mindset to bring out efficient results. That can be learnt through time and if of the right type, the whole process can be interesting along the way. However, the issue we face is the repetition. An Anime Moderator is required to have the will to repeat these searches day after day, ultimately resulting in hundreds of submissions being checked, re-checked and individual scans being made. Whether one likes it or not, the capability of not getting easily bored of such repetition is a quality one must posses, at least if one wishes to be an Anime Moderator for a longer while. Otherwise, their work will either fall to lower quality in time or the amount they perform will fall drastically under the minimum accepted rate. Therefore, to everyone applying, if you find these sort of issues presented in the OP interesting, then that is excellent. However, before actually applying, try to visualize the repetition of such cases through time. Multiply the amount of cases by a relatively big amount and ask yourself, would you still find it interesting even after all that? If yes, then the position is for you. If not, then think twice before applying. The task is tedious, and that is factual. |
Oct 19, 2015 11:34 AM
#32
Yeah, i thought about applying then it looks so complicated. Good luck for anyone who applied! |
Oct 19, 2015 1:25 PM
#33
Oct 19, 2015 2:05 PM
#34
@Kineta: Just don't forget to reply to my message, I'm waiting before the Deadline end. |
Oct 19, 2015 8:00 PM
#35
ThreePointer said: I was interested in being a moderator but it looks like the application process would take some time to finish. There isn't a deadline right? Deadline is Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 23:59 Pacific Time. |
Oct 21, 2015 2:17 PM
#36
Hah, not so motivated to be mod myself - won't have enough time and dedication to check on anime I don't know yet, but the feature of adding characters/people to episodes... I gotta expand my excel "info to submit" section by some more columns from now on xD |
Oct 21, 2015 7:06 PM
#37
I'm kinda motivated for this, I have a lots of free time for this, I have some experience to adding Anime to database here (Pokemon Best Wishes! Season 2: Decolora Adventure - Iris vs. Ibuki! Dragon Master e no Michi!!, Pokemon XY: Mega Evolution, Pokemon XY: Odemashi Ko Majin Fuupa and Pokemon XY&Z), I edited some existing Anime additions in past like Girls und Panzer Specials, Aikatsu! and more, I read AnimeNewsNetwork daily, I'm not afraid of spoilers for fixing information of addition and sometimes I read other news of Anime. So I really up for this and I can help on daily basis with Anime Database. |
[size=0][/size] |
Oct 23, 2015 9:01 PM
#38
I see that you must be 17 to apply but is there anyway to check the age of people who are applying, some might fake their age |
Oct 24, 2015 8:45 AM
#39
SamPolus22 said: I see that you must be 17 to apply but is there anyway to check the age of people who are applying, some might fake their age I think that you can understand how old is the person you are talking with just looking at how he/she writes, not always though. |
Nov 2, 2015 4:50 AM
#40
It's close now right? |
Nov 2, 2015 8:55 AM
#41
Yaoi-sensei said: It's close now right? Kineta said: [size=110] Submissions will be open for two weeks, ending on Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 23:59 Pacific Time. |
Nov 6, 2015 10:37 PM
#42
Username said: It's close now right? If at least one source says it is open, feel free to apply. Not accepting a solid application just because it missed the virtual deadline would be unreasonable. The staff here does follow rational principle and logic, so I'm sure they would accept it if still short on seemingly good apps. |
Nov 9, 2015 4:58 AM
#43
Nov 9, 2015 7:57 AM
#44
[/spoiler] OppaiSugoi said: Forum Moderators are terrible at their job, they are such lazy asses while letting threads that don't follow the rules run rampant. There's so much bait for flamewars in there it's not even funny. Have fun reading. [spoiler] [quote=Kineta] Concerns About Forum Moderators Hide spoiler Yes, time and dedication is important for being a staff member. If moderators don't have time to moderate, they shouldn't be moderators. It is not fair to the community nor to their fellow teammates if they hold a position in name only. Every moderator has been told this and is reminded if they stop holding up their end of the weight. But moderators aren't superhumans and they often get paid in complaints. We have only a small number of Forum Moderators compared to how many regularly posting users? At least a few hundred? Why is the onus only on them to improve MAL when they don't even have time to post (outside of a mod capacity) because they're too busy cleaning up after everyone else? You cannot judge how active a moderator is based on how many reports of yours he replies to nor how many threads he locks/moves/merges. For one, not all reports are equal. If a thread is made in the wrong board, the report can be quite simple and only take 5-10 minutes: move the thread, PM the OP saying it was moved and why, remove any rule violations in the post (usually users reprimanding the OP for posting in the wrong board, breaking rule I.6), contact the violator as necessary, and reply to the report. In comparison, an insult reported on page 3 of a thread can take over an hour. The moderator needs to read all messages in the thread, determine where the argument started, identify all posts that are violating the rules and whether they need to be edited/removed, actually remove/edit the necessary posts, check the user histories of any violators to determine which user(s) need to be warned/banned, write out any warnings/bans (both to the user and to our internal list), and respond to the report. If it is a straightforward thread, this can already be quite a bit of time - which is why you will see threads "locked for cleaning" to prevent the offending posts from being quoted/replied to. If it is a complicated thread, then the moderator may need to confer with another mod - either one who recently warned/banned an offender or to get a second opinion on what should be done with the thread/posts. The queried moderator also then needs to have a look through the thread to give an informed statement. This is why if the argument/derailment spans multiple pages of a long thread, the moderator may decide the topic isn't worth the time spent to save it and will permanently lock it. And if, while the moderator is spending >1hr working on this thread, a banned user comes on IRC to discuss their ban, then the moderator needs to stop what they're doing to discuss with that user. Speaking with banned users can take 10-15 minutes or over an hour themselves, depending on the offense and the user. This means that what appears to be a 3 hour wait for your report to be handled could actually be two or three mods working on the forum and on the report queue at that given time, but being busy moderating other reports/topics and speaking with users (in a mod capacity) on IRC. It takes time to deal with threads. Once a post or thread is removed, it's gone for good. The moderator needs to feel confident that he is aware of the situation and not just the viewpoint of the reporting user. For these reasons, the other moderators and I have a much better idea of which mods are doing what than the community does. We do not keep moderators on staff who do not contribute; I think the retired staff list is proof enough of that (now outnumbering our current staff). However, moderators are allowed to take hiatus for some time due to vacation or other real life matters and - while shared with the other moderators so that we know our workload will increase in advance - this is not something the community is notified about. While I agree that the nominees should be active enough in the community to know the regular users in the main forum, if the nominees are too knowing - and not trustworthy due to their behaviour - then the situation becomes ripe for biased moderators. "These guys are my buddies so I'll let them off, but damn I hate that fool so he gets a ban." Furthermore, just because you interact with regular users on the forum day-to-day doesn't mean that you know the user from a moderator perspective. For any user, becoming a Forum Moderator is an adjustment and the senior mods are here to help ramp them up as fast and smoothly as possible. No new moderator is perfect when they are hired (and even old moderators make mistakes from time to time). The announcement thread is partly a way for the community to welcome the new staff, but it's also there to say: "Hey, these guys are new, cut them some slack while we get them settled in". To turn this thread into a place where the new Forum Moderators are berated publicly for their first mistakes is really very sad and inconsiderate. If the new mods are making mistakes that you think the rest of the team isn't aware of (because we're watching them like hawks in the beginning to help them), then you can send one of us a PM discussing your concerns with us. The reason we prefer to discuss issues like this in PM is because in public, concerns quickly spiral into complaints which spiral into rants, which then turn into full blown mod-bashing and drama. Constructive criticism is welcome and even desired. If there are hours that you feel aren't moderated well enough, then contact one of us and tell us which those are. If there are things you feel could have been handled differently, or you want to get clarification on why something was done a certain way, then feel free to message and ask. We'd prefer you message us where and when we can have a reasonable conversation together about the issue, before all of your frustration builds up and moves past the breaking point. Mod-bashing is bad because it creates an us vs. them situation, rife with emotion and not logic. And when we're all here to contribute to our community as best as we can, this does not make for a good environment. I don't want our community to be a place where we can't have a simple welcome thread for new faces to the team without it becoming a place for people to berate each other. |
Nov 9, 2015 4:38 PM
#45
Grudge said: [/quote]OppaiSugoi said: Forum Moderators are terrible at their job, they are such lazy asses while letting threads that don't follow the rules run rampant. There's so much bait for flamewars in there it's not even funny. Have fun reading. [spoiler] blog on "Kineta ranting on defending lazy mods" I've already read Kineta's sob blog, and it proves that MAL staff are incompetent with high turnover. I'd like to be a mod but I smear the anime discussion board shitting on SAO so that's out of the question. For a website on the internets, MAL be damned. |
Nov 10, 2015 1:42 AM
#46
OppaiSugoi said: I've already read Kineta's sob blog, and it proves that MAL staff are incompetent with high turnover. I'd like to be a mod but I smear the anime discussion board shitting on SAO so that's out of the question. For a website on the internets, MAL be damned. Their team is pretty big and saying that all of them are just a bunch of lazy fellows, who don’t do anything for this website, is a little bit unfair. Even if you are right, don’t call the entire team of forum moderators lazy; some of them are very diligent in what they do for that website. To make a long story short, it is always easy to criticize; however, when it comes to actions, only a few will be ready to do something. So what I am trying to say is that if you have any concerns about their work, you can always discuss it with Kineta, or you can just set an example and become a moderator yourself. |
Nov 10, 2015 7:26 AM
#47
Grudge said: No one can replace Tyrel.OppaiSugoi said: I've already read Kineta's sob blog, and it proves that MAL staff are incompetent with high turnover. I'd like to be a mod but I smear the anime discussion board shitting on SAO so that's out of the question. For a website on the internets, MAL be damned. Their team is pretty big and saying that all of them are just a bunch of lazy fellows, who don’t do anything for this website, is a little bit unfair. Even if you are right, don’t call the entire team of forum moderators lazy; some of them are very diligent in what they do for that website. To make a long story short, it is always easy to criticize; however, when it comes to actions, only a few will be ready to do something. So what I am trying to say is that if you have any concerns about their work, you can always discuss it with Kineta, or you can just set an example and become a moderator yourself. |
Nov 11, 2015 1:17 PM
#48
OppaiSugoi said: I've already read Kineta's sob blog, and it proves that MAL staff are incompetent with high turnover. I'd like to be a mod but I smear the anime discussion board shitting on SAO so that's out of the question. For a website on the internets, MAL be damned. In a discussion with a previous forum mod, they have said that they usually agreed with what Kineta has led, but that the workload is just too massive. In a sense, Kineta isn't going easy on the mods. But at the same token, she cannot just retire anyone who doesn't reach the norm that would be necessary to pull it all through. Likewise, the staff must consist of members whose decisions she can trust and rely on, and by just that requirement the amount already heavily decreases. You see, while many might believe they are active and know the protocol, their actions display otherwise. A great example would be me. At the end of the day, Kineta doesn't know you in person. Therefore, the only way she can determine your potential is through the way you present yourself on the forums and elsewhere. Maturity and common sense is a necessity, as well as keeping your cool and staying sturdy behind your actions. Trust me, the staff here knows who is active and they do give everyone a chance. If found worth it, you will be asked to PM Kineta regarding the matter of becoming a forum mod, as there is evidently always work to be done. But recruiting foul members could lead to even bigger negative outcomes, which could very well effect aspects other than just the mod's field of moderation. What I want to say is, from my perspective, the things are run on a rational level. It is just unfortunate to both, the staff and the community, that more potentially suitable users cannot be found around or, in many cases, do not wish to join the team. |
Nov 18, 2015 6:01 AM
#50
SViper said: So any news on this? I'm waiting as well. I think it's still open. Kineta didn't say that it's close yet XD |
More topics from this board
» [Challenge] You Should Read This Manga 2024 ( 1 2 3 4 5 )Kineta - Feb 23 |
208 |
by Nikmomo93
»»
3 hours ago |
|
» Try MAL's New Mobile Site! ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Xinil - Feb 15, 2015 |
423 |
by RED-clover12
»»
9 hours ago |
|
» Planned 5hr Maintenance, Thursday April 25 @ 1am-6am PTKineta - Apr 22 |
0 |
by Kineta
»»
Apr 22, 8:10 PM |
|
» New Site Update: Peak Anime 🗻 ( 1 2 3 4 5 )Kineta - Mar 31 |
213 |
by Lancelot73
»»
Apr 21, 4:28 AM |
|
» Heavenly Easter Delusion: Devil and Dolce ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Kineta - Mar 27 |
3332 |
by Terra_strong
»»
Apr 17, 8:26 PM |